Paper · 1994 · Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics)

Development of a Greenhouse Screening Technique for Stem Rot Resistance in Groundnut

S Pande; J N Rao; M. Surya Prakash Reddy; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Groundnut cultivar Robut 33-1 was screened for resistance to stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii [Corticium rolfsii]) to compare 7 inoculation methods. Ten-day-old seedlings were inoculated with 10-day-old inoculum. The plants were observed for 30 days after inoculation, temperature within the greenhouse ranging from 16-31°C and humidity from 40-54.5%. The maximum mortality (100%) due to stem rot was observed when the inoculum was spread on the soil surface and covered with organic matter. It was concluded this is the best method for screening for resistance to S. rolfsii under greenhouse conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spreading stem rot inoculum on soil and covering it with organic matter produced the maximum mortality of 100%.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
inoculum was spread on the soil surface and covered with organic mattere0
Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie1pathogen
Outcome
mortality (100%) due to stem rote0
Direction
maximume0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum mortality (100%) due to stem rot was observed when the inoculum was spread on the soil surface and covered with organic matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sclerotium rolfsii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–89 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that spreading inoculum on the soil and covering it with organic matter was the best greenhouse screening method for resistance to S. rolfsii.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Interactor
S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Outcome
best method for screening for resistance to S. rolfsii under greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum mortality (100%) due to stem rot was observed when the inoculum was spread on the soil surface and covered with organic matter. It was concluded this is the best method for screening for resistance to S. rolfsii under greenhouse conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑

organic · Agroathelia rolfsii · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Agroathelia rolfsii · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.