Abstract
The efficacy of Pseudomonas putida (GN1) and Burholderia cepacia (KKM1) as seed treatment and soil application along with neem cake against groundnut root rot and stem rot disease was evaluated under rainfed conditions during the years 2021, 2022 and 2023. The present study is to evaluate biocontrol agents and organic amendments against Macrophomina phaseolina and Sclerotium rolfsii in peanut. The result showed that neem cake (10 %) recorded the maximum inhibition of Macrophomona phaseolina (40.91 %) and S. rolfsii (45.45 %) under in vitro whereas neem cake combined with P. putida and B. cepacia as seed treatment 10 g/kg of seed and soil Application of P. putida @ 2.5 kg + Neem cake 150 kg/ha decreases the soil-borne diseases of root rot (71.70 %) and stem rot (64.88 %) and also increased the yield 2130.48 kg/ha with the cost-benefit ratio of 2.74 under rainfed field conditions comparing to other treatments. In addition, the same treatment increased the total root length (2110.41 mm), Root tips (573 Nos), forks (501 Nos), Maximum diameter (18.11 mm) and estimated volume (27170 cm3 ) when using BioVis PSM Root -Rhizoscanner.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Neem cake at 10% maximally inhibited Macrophomona phaseolina in vitro by 40.91%.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- neem cake (10 %)e0
- Interactor
- Macrophomona phaseolinae0pathogen
- Outcome
- inhibition of Macrophomona phaseolinae0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 40.91 %e0
- Setting
- in vitroe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“neem cake (10 %) recorded the maximum inhibition of Macrophomona phaseolina (40.91 %) and S. rolfsii (45.45 %) under in vitro”
t0“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem cake at 10% maximally inhibited S. rolfsii in vitro by 45.45%.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- neem cake (10 %)e0
- Interactor
- S. rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen - Outcome
- maximum inhibitione0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 45.45 %e0
- Setting
- in vitroe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“neem cake (10 %) recorded the maximum inhibition of Macrophomona phaseolina (40.91 %) and S. rolfsii (45.45 %) under in vitro”
t0“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined seed and soil treatment decreased groundnut root rot by 71.70% relative to other treatments.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- neem cake combined with P. putida and B. cepacia as seed treatment 10 g/kg of seed and soil Application of P. putida @ 2.5 kg + Neem cake 150 kg/hae0
- Interactor
- Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolinat0pathogen - Second interactor
- P. putida
Pseudomonas putidae0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- root rote0
- Direction
- decreasese0
- Value
- 71.70 %e0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
- Setting
- rainfed field conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“neem cake combined with P. putida and B. cepacia as seed treatment 10 g/kg of seed and soil Application of P. putida @ 2.5 kg + Neem cake 150 kg/ha decreases the soil-borne diseases of root rot (71.70 %) and stem rot (64.88 %) and also increased the yield 2130.48 kg/ha with the cost-benefit ratio of 2.74 under rainfed field conditions comparing to other treatments.”
t0“Macrophomina phaseolina) and stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) control by plant growth promotion in groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment decreased stem rot by 64.88% relative to other treatments.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Pseudomonas putida GN1 and organic amendmentst0
- Interactor
- Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiit0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas putida GN1Pseudomonas putidat0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- stem rote0
- Direction
- decreasese0
- Value
- 64.88 %e0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
- Setting
- rainfed field conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“decreases the soil-borne diseases of root rot (71.70 %) and stem rot (64.88 %) and also increased the yield 2130.48 kg/ha with the cost-benefit ratio of 2.74 under rainfed field conditions comparing to other treatments.”
t0“Unshackle Pseudomonas putida GN1 and organic amendments against root rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) and stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) control by plant growth promotion in groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment increased yield to 2130.48 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Pseudomonas putida GN1 and organic amendmentst0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2130.48 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
- Setting
- rainfed field conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased the yield 2130.48 kg/ha with the cost-benefit ratio of 2.74 under rainfed field conditions comparing to other treatments.”
t0“Unshackle Pseudomonas putida GN1 and organic amendments against root rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) and stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) control by plant growth promotion in groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment had a cost-benefit ratio of 2.74.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- cost-benefit ratioe0
- Value
- 2.74e0
- Setting
- rainfed field conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with the cost-benefit ratio of 2.74 under rainfed field conditions”
t0“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment increased total root length to 2110.41 mm.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Pseudomonas putida GN1 and organic amendmentst0
- Outcome
- total root lengthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2110.41 mme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the same treatment increased the total root length (2110.41 mm), Root tips (573 Nos), forks (501 Nos), Maximum diameter (18.11 mm) and estimated volume (27170 cm3 )”
t0“Unshackle Pseudomonas putida GN1 and organic amendments against root rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) and stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) control by plant growth promotion in groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment increased root tips to 573.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Pseudomonas putida GN1 and organic amendmentst0
- Outcome
- Root tipse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 573 Nose0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the same treatment increased the total root length (2110.41 mm), Root tips (573 Nos), forks (501 Nos), Maximum diameter (18.11 mm) and estimated volume (27170 cm3 )”
t0“Unshackle Pseudomonas putida GN1 and organic amendments against root rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) and stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) control by plant growth promotion in groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment increased root forks to 501.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Pseudomonas putida GN1 and organic amendmentst0
- Outcome
- forkse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 501 Nose0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the same treatment increased the total root length (2110.41 mm), Root tips (573 Nos), forks (501 Nos), Maximum diameter (18.11 mm) and estimated volume (27170 cm3 )”
t0“Unshackle Pseudomonas putida GN1 and organic amendments against root rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) and stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) control by plant growth promotion in groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment increased maximum root diameter to 18.11 mm.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Pseudomonas putida GN1 and organic amendmentst0
- Outcome
- Maximum diametere0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 18.11 mme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the same treatment increased the total root length (2110.41 mm), Root tips (573 Nos), forks (501 Nos), Maximum diameter (18.11 mm) and estimated volume (27170 cm3 )”
t0“Unshackle Pseudomonas putida GN1 and organic amendments against root rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) and stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) control by plant growth promotion in groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment increased estimated root volume to 27170 cm3.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Pseudomonas putida GN1 and organic amendmentst0
- Outcome
- estimated volumee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 27170 cm3e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the same treatment increased the total root length (2110.41 mm), Root tips (573 Nos), forks (501 Nos), Maximum diameter (18.11 mm) and estimated volume (27170 cm3 )”
t0“Unshackle Pseudomonas putida GN1 and organic amendments against root rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) and stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) control by plant growth promotion in groundnut”
The same questions in other papers
Pseudomonas putida · Macrophomina phaseolina · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Pseudomonas putida · Agroathelia rolfsii · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Pseudomonas putida · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
organic · Agroathelia rolfsii · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
organic · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →organic · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →botanical · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →botanical · Macrophomina phaseolina · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.