Paper · 2013 · AMERICAN-EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

Yield stability of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) planted in intercropping system after 3 years of biochar application.

Titiek Islami; Syahrul Kurniawan; Wani Hadi Utomo

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was carried out to study the yield stability of cassava planted in cassava + peanuts intercropping systems after 3 years of biochar application was carried out from September 2009 to September 2012. The crops were treated with 5 organic amendment, i.e. (i) without organic amendment, (ii) farm yard manure (FYM) applied once at the first year only, (iii) FYM applied at every planting year, (iv) biochar made from FYM, and (v) biochar made from cassava stem. To calculate land use efficiency, additional treatment of monoculture cassava and monoculture peanuts were planted without organic amendment. The treatments were arranged in a randomized block design with 3 replications. The experimental result showed that addition both FYM and biochar improved soil quality and increased crop yield. The increase of cassava yield due to FYM addition was only occurred for the first year cassava, whereas that of for biochar still occurred until the third year cassava. The yield of the first yield peanuts did not significantly influenced by organic amendment application. To maintain the beneficial effect of FYM, it should be applied at every planting. Application of biochar increased and stabilized land use efficiency of cassava + peanut intercropping.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM improved soil quality in the intercropping trial.

Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
soil qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“addition both FYM and biochar improved soil quality and increased crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar improved soil quality.

Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
soil qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“addition both FYM and biochar improved soil quality and increased crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM increased crop yield, with the cassava yield increase confined to the first year.

Treatment
FYM additione0
Outcome
cassava yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
first year cassavae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase of cassava yield due to FYM addition was only occurred for the first year cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased cassava yield through the third year.

Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
crop yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
until the third year cassavae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“that of for biochar still occurred until the third year cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“addition both FYM and biochar improved soil quality and increased crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendments had no significant effect on first-year peanut yield.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
organic amendment applicatione0
Outcome
yield of the first yield peanutse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of the first yield peanuts did not significantly influenced by organic amendment application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1082 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend applying FYM at every planting to maintain its benefit.

Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
applied at every plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“To maintain the beneficial effect of FYM, it should be applied at every planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased and stabilized land-use efficiency in cassava-peanut intercropping.

Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
land use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of biochar increased and stabilized land use efficiency of cassava + peanut intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1267 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

organic · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

fertilization · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 141 positive, 12 negative or no effect

140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

biochar · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.