Paper · 1973 · CYTOLOGIA

Cytogenetic Studies in the Genus Iris: Subsection Evansia, Benth

B. B. Chimphamba

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The karyotype analyses of the Evansia species did not suggest any simple explanation for the origin of the progressional series of chromosome numbers of 2n=26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 42, 44 and 54. A comparison of the karyotypes of geographically adjacent species showed that an increase in chromosome number was accompanied by a decrease in chromosome size. Karyotype differnces did not always suggest lack of affinity between species as was shown between I. japonica and I. confusa which formed fertile hybrids although their karyotypes were very different. The hybrids between I. japonica and I. confusa vary in their chromosome numbers from 2n=39 to 2n=43. The karyotypes of I. wattii and I. confusa showed greater similarities, a correspondence paralleled by their successful hybridization to form F1 hybrids. I. wattii could represent a subspecies of I. confusa. Meiotic divisions in the available clones of I. wattii and I. japonica showed that these 2 species were atypical in that the latter was possibly a triploid and the former the product of a chromosomal interchange.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karyotype analyses gave no simple explanation for the chromosome-number series.

Taxon
IrisIrist0
Outcome
did not suggest any simple explanatione0
Value
2n=26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 42, 44 and 54e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris
Iris · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)No machine-readable author provided. Dlanglois assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The karyotype analyses of the Evansia species did not suggest any simple explanation for the origin of the progressional series of chromosome numbers of 2n=26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 42, 44 and 54”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among adjacent species, chromosome size decreased as chromosome number increased.

Taxon
IrisIrist0
Outcome
chromosome sizee0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
chromosome numbere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris
Iris · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)No machine-readable author provided. Dlanglois assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in chromosome number was accompanied by a decrease in chromosome size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–354 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I. japonica and I. confusa formed fertile hybrids despite different karyotypes.

Taxon
I. japonicaIris japonicae0
Material
I. confusae0
Outcome
fertile hybridse0
Qualifier
their karyotypes were very differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris japonica
Iris japonica · TaxonApple2000 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“I. japonica and I. confusa which formed fertile hybrids although their karyotypes were very different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–555 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrids of I. japonica and I. confusa varied from 2n=39 to 2n=43 chromosomes.

Taxon
I. japonicaIris japonicae0
Material
I. confusae0
Outcome
chromosome numberse0
Value
2n=39 to 2n=43e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris japonica
Iris japonica · TaxonApple2000 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hybrids between I. japonica and I. confusa vary in their chromosome numbers from 2n=39 to 2n=43”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I. wattii and I. confusa had similar karyotypes.

Taxon
I. wattiiIris wattiie0
Material
I. confusae0
Outcome
karyotypese0
Direction
greater similaritiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris wattii
Iris wattii · TaxonStan Shebs · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The karyotypes of I. wattii and I. confusa showed greater similarities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–728 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I. wattii and I. confusa successfully formed F1 hybrids.

Taxon
IrisIrist0
Outcome
successful hybridization to form F1 hybridse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris
Iris · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)No machine-readable author provided. Dlanglois assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their successful hybridization to form F1 hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I. wattii may represent a subspecies of I. confusa.

Taxon
I. wattiiIris wattiie0
Outcome
subspecies of I. confusae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris wattii
Iris wattii · TaxonStan Shebs · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“I. wattii could represent a subspecies of I. confusa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–864 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I. japonica was possibly triploid.

Taxon
I. japonicaIris japonicae1
Outcome
possibly a triploide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris japonica
Iris japonica · TaxonApple2000 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the latter was possibly a triploid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1021 · show in text ↑
e1

“I. wattii and I. japonica showed that these 2 species were atypical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–978 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I. wattii may be the product of a chromosomal interchange.

Taxon
I. wattiiIris wattiie1
Outcome
product of a chromosomal interchangee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris wattii
Iris wattii · TaxonStan Shebs · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the former the product of a chromosomal interchange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1077 · show in text ↑
e1

“I. wattii and I. japonica showed that these 2 species were atypical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–978 · show in text ↑