- 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- AzotobacterResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Gibberellic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- boric acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chitosanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc sulfateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- storagePositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- processingResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- radiationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.