Nutrient: content · Chrysanthemum

1. sucroseResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. ArtemisiaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. fertilizationPositive and negative results14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. nitrogenPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
6. lightPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. otherPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. stagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. inoculationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. co2Results agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
11. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. growing mediumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.