Leucoptera coffeella · Coffea (coffee)

1. Allium sativumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. Dysphania ambrosioidesResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Toona ciliataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Trichilia casarettiResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Trichilia pallidaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. kaolinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. propolis extractResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. botanicalResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. limeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.