Hemileia vastatrix · Coffea (coffee)

1. silicon atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. epoxiconazoleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Bacillus subtilisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. pyraclostrobinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. applicationPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6. botanicalResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. fungicideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.