Growth · Tagetes erecta (African marigold)

42 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. N-benzyladeninePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. cadmium atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  4. salicylic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. Maleic hydrazidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. sodium chloridePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. Gibberellic acidResults agree32 papers: 32 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. AzotobacterResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. chlormequat chlorideResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. zinc sulfateResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. potassium nitrateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. paclobutrazolResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. zinc atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. boric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. indole-3-butyric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. fertilizationPositive and negative results48 papers: 47 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  19. pruningPositive and negative results22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  20. nitrogenPositive and negative results13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  21. lightPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  22. classPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  23. growing mediumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. heavy metalPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  25. applicationResults agree18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. inoculationResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. phosphorusResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. densityResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. mulchingResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. otherResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. salinityResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  32. transplantingResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. mycorrhizaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. climate siteResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. organicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  38. radiationResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  39. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  40. potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  41. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  42. storageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.