Callosobruchus chinensis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)

8 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. Curcuma longaPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  2. Azadirachta indicaResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. Acorus calamusResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. Cinnamomum verumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. emamectin benzoateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. soybean oilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. spinosadResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. botanicalResults agree19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.