Maruca vitrata · Vigna radiata (mung bean)

1. chlorantraniliproleResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. spinosadResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. imidaclopridResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. indoxacarbResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. flubendiamideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. cypermethrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. emamectin benzoateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. quinalphosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. insecticideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.