Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna radiata (mung bean)

10 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. carbofuranResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  2. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. Purpureocillium lilacinumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. inoculationPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  5. fertilizationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. botanicalResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. seed treatmentResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. pathogen productResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.