- chromium atomResults differ2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- 1-naphthaleneacetic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- RhizobiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phosphorusResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salinityResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- radiationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.