Crop injury · Beta vulgaris (beet)

1. phenmediphamPositive and negative results7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect
2. desmediphamPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
3. CycloatePositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
4. dimethenamid-PPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. ethofumesatePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6. Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarisPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. thifensulfuronPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. adjuvantResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
9. ImazethapyrResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. chlorpyrifosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. chlorsulfuronResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. clomazoneResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. imazamethabenz-methylResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. metolachlorResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. triflusulfuronResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. herbicidePositive and negative results11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect
17. transplantingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. cover cropResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
20. insecticideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.