Physiology: photosynthesis · Beta vulgaris (beet)

36 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. sodium chloridePositive and negative results6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  2. boron atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  3. copper atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. cadmium atomResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  5. glyphosateResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  6. silicon atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. N-benzyladenineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. desmediphamResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  9. fomesafenResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  10. iron atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. CercosporaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  12. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  13. glucoseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. nicosulfuronResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  15. p-chloromercuribenzenesulfonic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  16. phenmediphamResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  17. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  20. salinityPositive and negative results14 papers: 2 positive, 12 negative or no effect
  21. nitrogenPositive and negative results12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  22. fertilizationPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. applicationPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. inoculationPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  25. lightPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  26. co2Positive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  27. alkalinityPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  28. herbicidePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  29. phosphorusPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  30. nanoparticlePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  31. droughtResults agree9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect
  32. otherResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. growing mediumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  36. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.