Growth · Hibiscus sabdariffa (roselle)

1. jasmonic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. salicylic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. silicon atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. ascorbic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. manganese atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. salinityResults differ5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
9. sowing timePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. intercroppingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. radiationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. fertilizationResults agree13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. applicationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. inoculationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. otherResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. droughtResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
18. nitrogenResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. storageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.