Nutrient: content · Punica granatum (pomegranate)

1. iron atomResults differ3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. sodium chloridePositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
3. zinc atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. zinc sulfateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. potassium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. applicationPositive and negative results13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. fertilizationPositive and negative results10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect
11. salinityPositive and negative results9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect
12. irrigationPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. otherPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. trap barrierPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. potassiumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. shadeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.