Growth · Pyrus communis (pear)

51 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. Gibberellic acidResults differ12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  2. prohexadionePositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. ThidiazuronPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. Cydonia oblongaPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  6. agarPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  7. paclobutrazolPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  8. 1-methylcyclopropenePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  9. boron atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  10. calcium chloride dihydratePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  11. chlormequat chloridePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  12. copper atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  13. putrescinePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  14. sodium chloridePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  15. N-benzyladenineResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. indole-3-butyric acidResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. forchlorfenuronResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. prohexadione-calciumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. indole-3-acetic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. Allium sativumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. GlomusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. Pyrus koehneiResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. Rhizophagus intraradicesResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. ascorbic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. cefotaximeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  26. plant growth stimulatorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. fertilizationPositive and negative results25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  28. applicationPositive and negative results20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  29. in vitroPositive and negative results17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  30. irrigationPositive and negative results13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  31. graftingPositive and negative results12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  32. pruningPositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  33. droughtPositive and negative results8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  34. inoculationPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  35. lightPositive and negative results8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  36. salinityPositive and negative results6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  37. classPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  38. coldPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  39. trap barrierPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  40. growing mediumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  41. cultivation systemPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  42. stagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  43. storagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  44. transgenicPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  45. botanicalResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  46. otherResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  47. nitrogenResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  48. infectionResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  49. seed treatmentResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  50. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.