Nutrient: content · Pyrus communis (pear)

1. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. calcium atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. iron atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. boraxResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. boron atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Medicago sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. ammonium dihydrogen phosphateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. boric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. calcium nitrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. iron molecular entityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. iron(2+) sulfate heptahydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. zinc sulfate heptahydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. applicationPositive and negative results29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. fertilizationPositive and negative results23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. nitrogenPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. pruningPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
18. trap barrierPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
19. botanicalResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. potassiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. phosphorusResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
23. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
25. organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.