- iron atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- 1-methylcyclopropeneResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- putrescineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- pruningPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.