fertilization · Quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)

Positive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect2011201220132014201520162017
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 3

  1. Effects of integrated nitrogen fertilization and irrigation systems, rootstocks, and cultivars on productivity, water and nitrogen consumption, and mineral nutrition of pear · 2012

  2. Method of Making Pear Fruit-Derived Nutrient Solution and Its Effect on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Fruit Quality · 2012

  3. Different effects of four commercial fertilizers on organic pear orchard · 2014

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2

  1. Study on Improvement of Fruit Quality of ‘Longgangchi’ Pear by Microbial Foliar Fertilizer · 2011

  2. PRODUCTIVITY OF OSNOVIANSKA PEAR VARIETY AFTER FOLIAR FEEDING WITH OPTIMAL SOIL SUPPLY WITH MACRONUTRIENTS (NPK) · 2017

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

fertilization on Pyrus communis (pear) against other targets

fertilization · quality: postharvest on other organisms