Abstract
Using 10-year-old ‘Longgangchi’ pear as experimental material,effects of different concentrations microbial foliar fertilizer on appearant quality and internal quality of ‘Longgangchi’ pear were studied.The results showed that,microbial foliar fertilizer could improve significantly single fruit weight and reduce significantly pericap thickness,but low concentrations had not significant improvement on peel color and smoothness,fruit rust and taste,only had slight improvement on high concentrations.Microbial foliar fertilizer could improve significantly on soluble sugar content and soluble solids,reduced significantly titratable acid content and stone cell content,but fruit hardness not significant improvement.Higher concentrations could increase fruit quality of 'Longgangrchi' pear,effects of 1∶600 was the best through comprehensive comparison.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Microbial foliar fertilizer significantly increased single fruit weight.
- Taxon
- pear
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=60)
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- microbial foliar fertilizere0
- Outcome
- single fruit weighte0
- Direction
- improvee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pear”
e0“microbial foliar fertilizer could improve significantly single fruit weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Microbial foliar fertilizer significantly reduced pericarp thickness.
- Taxon
- pearPyrus communist0
- Treatment
- microbial foliar fertilizere0
- Outcome
- pericap thicknesse0
- Direction
- reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pear”
e0“microbial foliar fertilizer could improve significantly single fruit weight and reduce significantly pericap thickness”
Claim · model-written summary
Low fertilizer concentrations did not significantly improve peel color, smoothness and fruit rust.
- Taxon
- pearPyrus communist0
- Treatment
- low concentrationse0
- Outcome
- peel color and smoothness,fruit ruste0
- Direction
- not significant improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pear”
e0“low concentrations had not significant improvement on peel color and smoothness,fruit rust and taste”
Claim · model-written summary
Low fertilizer concentrations did not significantly improve taste.
- Taxon
- pearPyrus communist0
- Treatment
- low concentrationse0
- Outcome
- tastee0
- Direction
- not significant improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pear”
e0“low concentrations had not significant improvement on peel color and smoothness,fruit rust and taste”
Claim · model-written summary
High concentrations slightly improved external quality and taste.
- Taxon
- pearPyrus communist0
- Treatment
- high concentrationse0
- Outcome
- slight improvemente0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pear”
e0“only had slight improvement on high concentrations”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer significantly improved soluble sugar content and soluble solids.
- Taxon
- pearPyrus communist0
- Treatment
- Microbial foliar fertilizere0
- Outcome
- soluble sugar content and soluble solidse0
- Direction
- improvee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pear”
e0“Microbial foliar fertilizer could improve significantly on soluble sugar content and soluble solids”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer significantly reduced titratable acid and stone cell content.
- Taxon
- pearPyrus communist0
- Treatment
- Microbial foliar fertilizere1
- Outcome
- titratable acid content and stone cell contente0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pear”
e0“reduced significantly titratable acid content and stone cell content”
e1“Microbial foliar fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer did not significantly improve fruit hardness.
- Taxon
- pearPyrus communist0
- Treatment
- Microbial foliar fertilizere1
- Outcome
- fruit hardnesse0
- Direction
- not significant improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pear”
e0“fruit hardness not significant improvement”
e1“Microbial foliar fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1∶600 concentration gave the best overall fruit quality.
- Taxon
- pearPyrus communist0
- Treatment
- 1∶600e0
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pear”
e0“Higher concentrations could increase fruit quality of 'Longgangrchi' pear,effects of 1∶600 was the best through comprehensive comparison”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →application · molecular: metabolites · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →application · quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →application · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →fertilization · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · physiology: osmolytes · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.