- Arachis hypogaeaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- pruningPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- limePositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- shadePositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- phosphorusPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- co2Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- intercroppingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- lightResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.