Penicillium italicum · Citrus

1. ethylenediaminetetraacetic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. Debaryomyces hanseniiResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. ammonium carbonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. copper(II) sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. sodium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. sodium carbonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. sodium disulfiteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. loss of functionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. ozoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.