- sodium chlorideResults differ2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- aluminium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- spermidineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults differ7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- salinityPositive and negative results9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- coldPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- floodingResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- pruningResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- shadeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.