- Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- salinityPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- lightPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- floodingResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- loss of functionResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- graftingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- herbicideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.