- enilconazoleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- citralResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Papiliotrema laurentiiResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Saccharomycopsis schoeniiResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- citric acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- potassium sorbateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sodium carbonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- loss of functionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.