Nutrient: content · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)

1. zinc atomPositive and negative results11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect
2. iron atomPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. manganese atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. boron atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. Citrus x aurantiumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. aluminium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. ammonium nitratePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. ethylenediaminetetraacetic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. calcium atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. Gibberellic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. copper atomResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
12. silicon atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. ammonium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. potassium nitrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. potassium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. nitrogenResults differ12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
17. fertilizationPositive and negative results31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect
18. applicationPositive and negative results26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect
19. potassiumPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
20. botanicalPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. graftingPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. irrigationPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
23. phosphorusPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
24. micronutrientPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
25. processingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. inoculationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. phResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. mulchingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. otherResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. transgenicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
32. intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. salinityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.