Quality: grain · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)

1. iron atomResults differ4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. salicylic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. zinc atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. 2,4-DResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6. boron atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. silicate(4-)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. applicationPositive and negative results16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect
10. fertilizationPositive and negative results10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect
11. botanicalPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. irrigationPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. nitrogenPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. otherPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. potassiumPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. graftingPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. inoculationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. coldResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.