Quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)

1. clusterResults differ15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect · 3 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
2. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. salicylic acidResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. 4-sulfanilamidobenzoic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. ethanolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. selenium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. pruningResults differ51 papers: 43 positive, 8 negative or no effect · 9 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
15. irrigationPositive and negative results26 papers: 16 positive, 10 negative or no effect
16. droughtPositive and negative results17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect
17. uvPositive and negative results15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect
18. lightPositive and negative results11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect
19. applicationPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. shadePositive and negative results10 papers: 1 positive, 9 negative or no effect
21. botanicalPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. processingPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. rainfallPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. stagePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. coldPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
26. nitrogenPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. co2Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
28. in vitroPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
29. infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. resistance inducerPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
31. heatResults agree10 papers: 0 positive, 10 negative or no effect
32. otherResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. fertilizationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. nanoparticleResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. graftingResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
36. mulchingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. radiationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. classResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. cover cropResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. storageResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
41. trap barrierResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
42. densityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
43. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
44. ozoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.