Quality: sugar starch · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)

1. clusterResults differ13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. 4-sulfanilamidobenzoic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. calcium chloride dihydratePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. ethanolPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Gibberellic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. Aloe veraResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. citric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. sodium chlorideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. pruningResults differ54 papers: 38 positive, 16 negative or no effect · 31 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
15. droughtResults differ13 papers: 3 positive, 10 negative or no effect · 5 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
16. irrigationResults differ12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
17. applicationPositive and negative results15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect
18. fertilizationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. graftingPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
20. heatPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
21. otherPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
22. shadePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
23. trap barrierPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. botanicalResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. classResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. lightResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
27. climate siteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. coldResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
29. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
30. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. uvResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.