- prochlorazPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- calcium carbonatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- imidaclopridResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- benomylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- buprofezinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- carbosulfanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- copper atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- glyphosateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- paraquatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fungicideResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- trap barrierResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- insecticideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- radiationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- storageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.