- paclobutrazolResults differ2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- zinc atomPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- 1-naphthaleneacetic acidPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- 1-dodecylguanidine acetatePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- zinc sulfatePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- indole-3-butyric acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- benomylResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- zinc oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- pruningResults differ29 papers: 18 positive, 11 negative or no effect · 3 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
- nitrogenPositive and negative results8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- pollinationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- climate sitePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- fungicidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- insecticidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- stageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.