Growth · Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine)

1. N-benzyladenineResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. FusariumResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. sulfur dioxideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6. pollutionResults agree7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect
7. classResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. seed treatmentResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. shadeResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
10. tillageResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. heatResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. storageResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. floodingResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. heavy metalResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. organicResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. soilResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.