application · Bombyx mori · Morus (mulberry trees)

Positive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect20102012201420162018202020222024
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 4

  1. Control Effect of 24% Phoxim Chlorfenapyr EC on Lepidoptera Pests and Residue Testing · 2010

  2. Bio-efficacy of organic foliar sprays on mulberry and cocoon production · 2014

  3. Performance of Silkworm, Bombyx mori L. (Fc1 X Fc2) Reared on Mulberry Raised with Foliar Applied Different Volumes of Nano Nitrogen · 2024

  4. The influence of ‘Surya Kiran’ on rearing performance of silkworm · 2024

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3

  1. Effect of botanical extracts against thrips (Pseudodendrothrips mori) infested mulberry on enzyme activity in silkworm, Bombyx mori L. · 2012

  2. Effect of Botanical Extracts against the Tukra (Maconellicoccus Hirsutus) Infested Mulberry on Trehalose and Phosphorylase Activity in Silkworm, Bombyx Mori L. · 2012

  3. Efficacy of Botanical extracts with incidence of tukra mulberry on histopathology of Silkworm, ( Bombyx mori L.) · 2016

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

application on Morus (mulberry trees) against other targets