Yield · Morus (mulberry trees)

1. zinc sulfateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. AzospirillumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Bombyx moriResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Glycine maxResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Vigna radiata var. radiataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Vigna unguiculataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. chlormequat chlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. fertilizationPositive and negative results29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect
11. applicationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. nitrogenResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. pruningResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. intercroppingResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. phosphorusResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. potassiumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. botanicalResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. co2Results agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. irrigationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. mulchingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. radiationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.