Physiology: oxidative · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)

22 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. zinc atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. nickel atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. cadmium atomResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  4. 5-aminolevulinic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. TironResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. benzoateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  7. choline chlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. formateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  9. zinc oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. otherPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  11. salinityPositive and negative results7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  12. nitrogenPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  13. coldPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  14. uvPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  15. applicationResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. heavy metalResults agree7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect
  17. droughtResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  18. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. lightResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.