Quality: general · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)

1. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. 1-methylcyclopropeneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. N-benzyladenineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. citric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. applicationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. growing mediumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. processingResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.