Quality: postharvest · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)

1. sucrosePositive and negative results20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. silver atomPositive and negative results15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. ethenePositive and negative results9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect
4. thiosulfatePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. N-benzyladeninePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. putrescinePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. spermidinePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. sperminePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. 1-methylcyclopropeneResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. salicylic acidResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. silver nanoparticleResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. amitroleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. sodium nitroprussideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. ThidiazuronResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. citric acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. poly(propylene)Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. silver(1+) nitrateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. ethanolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. glucoseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. inorganic saltResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. kinetinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. botanicalPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. processingPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
28. loss of functionPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
29. storagePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. nitrogenPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
31. nanoparticleResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. applicationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. coldResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. fertilizationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. lightResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. pruningResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. radiationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. in vitroResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.