- chlormequat chloridePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- kinetinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Trichoderma virideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- otherPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- growing mediumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- densityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fungicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- pruningResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- solarizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.