biocontrol · Botrytis cinerea · Vitis

Results agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 claims from these papers; 5 citations between them.

How these papers cite each other

5 citations between these papers: 5 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect19901995200020052010201520202025
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 9

  1. Biological and integrated control of grey mould of grapevine: results in Italy1 · 1988

    cited by 1 paper here

  2. Control of Grapevine Grey Mould with Trichoderma harzianum T39 · 1996

    cites 1 paper herecited by 2 papers here

  3. Laboratory assays for selection of Botrytis suppressive microorganisms on necrotic grape leaf discs · 2006

  4. LABORATORYASSAYSFORSELECTIONOFBOTRYTIS SUPPRESSIVEMICRO-ORGANISMSONNECROTIC GRAPELEAFDISCS · 2006

  5. Control of gray mold of grape by Hanseniaspora uvarum and its effects on postharvest quality parameters · 2010

  6. Use of biocontrol agents and botanicals in integrated management of Botrytis cinerea in table grape vineyards · 2017

    cites 1 paper herecited by 1 paper here

  7. Microbial Antagonism Toward Botrytis Bunch Rot of Grapes in Multiple Field Tests Using One Bacillus ginsengihumi Strain and Formulated Biological Control Products · 2019

    cites 1 paper herecited by 1 paper here

  8. Integration of mathematical modeling and target‐based application of biocontrol agents for the control of Botrytis cinerea in vineyards · 2024

    cites 2 papers here

  9. EFIKASNOST BIOFUNGICIDA EKSTRASOL F U POLJSKIM USLOVIMA U CILJU SUZBIJANJA BOTRYOTINIA FUCKELIANA I MONILINIA SPP. · 2025

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

biocontrol on Vitis against other targets

biocontrol · Botrytis cinerea on other organisms