Botrytis cinerea · Vitis

42 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. copper atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. fenhexamidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. chitosanResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. Aureobasidium pullulansResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. TrichodermaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. cyprodinilResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. iprodioneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. Bacillus subtilisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. Bacillus velezensisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. Fermentozyma sakeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. Metschnikowia pulcherrimaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. PichiaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. Pichia kluyveriResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. SaccharomycesResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. acibenzolar-S-methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. ethanolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. fluopyramResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. potassium hydrogencarbonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. prohexadioneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. thymolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. volatile organic compoundResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. botanicalPositive and negative results17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. inoculationPositive and negative results14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  25. applicationPositive and negative results10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  26. pollutionPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  27. loss of functionPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  28. uvPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  29. mechanicalPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  30. mulchingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  31. biocontrolResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. fungicideResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. in vitroResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. ozoneResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. pathogen productResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. pruningResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  38. humidityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  39. infectionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  40. solarizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  41. stageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  42. storageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.