Phenology · Vitis

1. Allium sativumResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. boric acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. diallyl disulfideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. ThidiazuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. magnesium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. graftingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.