Quality: grain · Vitis

1. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
2. forchlorfenuronPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. 1-methylcyclopropeneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Aloe veraResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. cyanamideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. applicationPositive and negative results7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect
8. irrigationPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. pruningPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
10. fertilizationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. processingPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. storagePositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. co2Positive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. inoculationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. otherPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. trap barrierPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. stageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.