Soil: biology · Vitis

1. salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. Cosmos sulphureusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Lysobacter capsiciResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
4. penconazoleResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. inoculationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. otherPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. pruningPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. fertilizationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. intercroppingResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. mulchingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. cover cropResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. fungicideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. graftingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. storageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.