- kaolinResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- mulchingPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- pruningPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- lightPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- tillagePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- growing mediumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- processingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cover cropResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- shadeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.