Quality: postharvest · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)

1. 1-methylcyclopropeneResults differ38 papers: 34 positive, 4 negative or no effect · 31 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
2. ethenePositive and negative results12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect
3. nitric oxidePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. ascorbic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. carvacrolPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. hydrogen sulfidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. sperminePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. calcium atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. calcium dichlorideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. chitosanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. melatoninResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. ThidiazuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. citric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. propeneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. spermidineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. storagePositive and negative results31 papers: 24 positive, 7 negative or no effect
20. applicationPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. ozonePositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
22. co2Positive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. coldPositive and negative results6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect
24. botanicalPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
25. shadePositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
26. solarizationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. cultivation systemPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
28. lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
29. pollinationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. radiationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
31. processingResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. graftingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. heatResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. droughtResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. humidityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. physical treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. trap barrierResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.