Quality: sugar starch · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)

1. 1-methylcyclopropeneResults differ12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 9 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
2. forchlorfenuronResults differ7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
3. 2,4-DPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. oxalic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. iron atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. Gibberellic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. calcium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. nitric oxideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. citric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. etheneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. pruningPositive and negative results9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect
14. applicationPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. shadePositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
16. lightPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. fertilizationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. storageResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. ozoneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.