Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)

1. pheromonePositive and negative results10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect
2. chlorpyrifosPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. cypermethrinPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. bifenthrinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. emamectin benzoateResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. profenofosResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. spinosadResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. thiodicarbResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. SpinetoramResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. Trichogrammatoidea bactraeResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. alpha-cypermethrinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. indoxacarbResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. maleate(2-)Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. pyridalylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. Abelmoschus esculentusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. Trichogramma evanescensResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. Zea maysResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. azadirachtinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. chlorantraniliproleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. lambda-cyhalothrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. methomylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. novaluronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. thiamethoxamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. triazophosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. insecticidePositive and negative results17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect
27. transgenicPositive and negative results17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect
28. applicationPositive and negative results13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect
29. botanicalPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. infectionPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
31. climate sitePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
32. ipmResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. trap barrierResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. co2Results agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
36. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.