Rotylenchulus reniformis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)

1. aldicarbResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. oxamylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Zea mays subsp. maysResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. fluopyramResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. insecticidePositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. transgenicPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. seed treatmentResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. rotationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. solarizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.